I was talking with a friend about this Aceh Green last
night, on the way home from my first debut singing on Aceh TV . For me, Aceh
Green is a blurry concept made by current Aceh Governor, Irwandi Yusuf. We,
Acehnese, never actually know about the concept. All I know is that there is a
big billboard in the secondary artery road which written “The Development toward
Aceh Green”. Well, there is a moratorium logging regulation supported by The Multi Donor Fund
(MDF) through the World Bank, but that's for forest conservation in Ulu Masen and Leuser. What about other areas??Urban areas?? Rural areas??
I don’t want to protest much in here, but what is green
anyway?? How green would the governor want Aceh to be??
Refer to the standard
of land use planning, green associates with open green areas, gardens, parks
filled with trees, and jungles. Moreover, if Aceh want to follow the fortunes
of modernist urbanism… green means to find jungle and urban form entangled
again, literally.
I guess we all agree that Aceh is a lush tropical place
where nature has already provided its own “green”. Stephen Cairns, an
Australian architect stated in his essay about urban jungle, that the
twentieth-century anxiety around the urban jungle is already pre-figured in
this part of the world. In North Sumatra, across the MalaccaStrait from where Singapore now stands, was the city of Aceh, a place where the
idea of the urban jungle full reign was allowed.
Before Cairns,
Anthony Reid and Denys Lombard have actually mentioned about this urban jungle
form in Aceh.
Sixteenth-century English traveler
Captain John Davis was confused by his first sighting of the city: it was very
spacious yet built in wood, so it was not visible from a distance and seemed to
leak out across the countryside.
French Jesuit SJ Premare was also
puzzled by the entanglement by the dwellings and jungle in Aceh. So much so
that he could not see the city at all. He reported: imagine a forest of coconut
trees, bamboos, pineapples, bananas, through the midst of which passes quite a
beautiful river all covered with boats; put in this forest an incredible number
of houses made of canes, reeds and bark, and arrange them in such a manner that
they sometimes form streets, sometimes separate quarters; divide these various
quarters by meadows and woods. Everything is neglected and natural, rustic and
even a little wild. When one is at anchor one sees not a single vestige or
appearance of a city, because the great trees along the shore hide its entire
house.
(Both cited in Reid, 1980, The
structure of cities in Southeast Asia,
fifteenth to seventeenth centuries)
I don’t see Aceh (the terminology Aceh is actually used to
describe the city of Kuta Radja,
the so called Banda Aceh nowadays) the way Reid and Lombard had seen. I see
Aceh as a mish mash of whatever… it has no figure and it seems to obey urbanism
rules.
However, there is a dwelling I know in Aceh Besar with
traditional concept of land use called Gampong Lubuk. I made observation and
analyzed its spatial structure for my final project, of which I am sure, the
findings are well known among Acehnese (especially for those who study
architecture). The study showed that the spatial concept formed by physical
characters of the settlement, indicates a division of land use; housing area is
located in the middle of settlement called tumpok, public facility is
located not far from the housing area called ujong, and farming area is
located outside of the housing area called blang. There are some villages
also in Aceh Pidie with similar spatial structure as Gampong Lubuk, which
strengthen the idea that Acehnese actually has the urban/rural jungle spatial
concept already, the Aceh Green.
We have all the concept... There are already lots of recommendations for
spatial planning in Aceh, that it is important for people/institutions involved
in spatial planning to acknowledge the spatial concept of Aceh through history
and traditional values.
What Aceh really need is a real action of the concept
itself.
Now... big question for me!!! What can I do?? I have betrayed my academic background...
Oh, about my singing debut… it was crap!! I’m not singing
anymore…
Diny April 1, 2009 11:50 PM PDT I've never been to Banda Aceh, but from the pictures I've seen on the Net before tsunami, looked like it's green enough. Well, compare to Jakarta anyway.
But I would agree, to make a city green, that would mean the inner city, regardless there's jungles outside of the city.
My other thought, 'go green' could also mean more active in recycling. Doesn't always have to be planting trees or build a park inside the city, IMHO.
belum bisa tidur April 5, 2009 01:28 AM PDT yeah chi... i'm also getting bit hustled by this 'green' mumbo jumbo stuff too
n u know what? nowadays IT companies are also sprouting around talks of 'green IT this, green IT that', n one might (if not certainly) think, what's IT got to do with making the world greener?
ha ha
well, i think its what they mean of making things more energy efficient then they used to be. so in this case, green = resource efficient = nature friendly. =)
whatever the reason might be though, i still feel that lately the 'green' word is jst somewhat 'abused' in many ways.